• About

Desperado's Outpost

Desperado's Outpost

Category Archives: economy

Who Says Crime Doesn’t Pay?

12 Monday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in AIG, bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, too big to fail, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

AIG, banksters, bonuses, Charles Prince, Citigroup, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Joseph Cassano

Who says crime doesn’t pay? If you happen to be a bankster or the crook who caused the collapse at AIG which, but for $182 billion courtesy of that never-ending ATM known as the American taxpayer, nearly led to the meltdown of our entire financial system, it pays like a Las Vegas slot machine. Consider the cases of Charles Prince, former Citigroup CEO, and Joseph Cassano, former head of AIG’s Financial Products Unit.

At last week’s Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearings Prince expressed his regret:

“I’m sorry that the financial crisis has had such a devastating impact on our country. I’m sorry for the millions of people, average Americans, who have lost their homes. And I’m sorry that our management team, starting with me, like so many others, could not see the unprecedented market collapse that lay before us.”

But not sorry enough to give back any of his ill-gotten gain from 2007 (emphasis added) :

“Prince, arguably the person most responsible for Citigroup’s enormous problems, can expect at least a $12.5 million cash bonus, compared with last year’s cash payout of $13.8 million.

And as he awaits his official retirement next month, Prince can rest assured that he will leave with $68 million, including his salary and accumulated stockholdings; a $1.7 million pension; an office, car and driver for up to five years — all in addition to the bonus. That is on top of $53.1 million he has taken home in the last four years, a period when $64 billion in the company’s market value has evaporated.”

However, Mr. Prince is a pauper compared to the HCIC (head crook in charge) at AIG, Joseph Cassano:

“Joseph Cassano was the head of AIG’s Financial Products Unit. They are the ones that made about a trillion dollars worth of bets in credit default swaps. They lost.

So, what happened to Cassano? This was all his idea and his team that brought on this colossal collapse. Well, he was fired! Great, justice served…Oh, did I forget to mention one thing? He received $35 million in bonuses when he was let go.”

…When they lost the bets, their company was devastated. Completely and utterly bankrput. The failure was so large, it promised to drag down the rest of the global economy with it. This forced the government to step in and cover their losses. So far, the United States taxpayers have put in $182 billion to keep AIG afloat.

That 35 mil was only tip money for Cassano:

“How much did he make for himself from 2000 to 2008 by gambling with the company’s money? Only $280 million…In the end, he walked away with over $315 million for destroying the company and maybe the whole economy.”

All that and no accountability required:

“This week the Wall Street Journal reported that prosecutors will likely not charge him with fraud. They are not going to try for clawbacks to get some of the money back. In the end, he gets away scott-free. But it’s better than free, he gets to keep all the money he never really made in the first place…”

The best way to rob a bank is to become a banker.

Banksters Up To Their Old Tricks

09 Friday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, Politics, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bank of America, Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, hiding, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, risk, Wall Street

Wall Street is up to its old tricks again, juggling the books to make their levels of debt appear lower at the end of the quarter which….drum roll please….increases their bonuses:

“Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup are the big names among 18 banks revealed by data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to be hiding their risk levels in the past five quarters by lowering the amount of leverage on the balance sheet before making it available to the public, The Wall Street Journal reported.

…There is nothing illegal about the practice, though it means that much of the time investors can have little idea of the risks the any bank is really taking.”

…“You want your leverage to look better at quarter-end than it actually was during the quarter, to suggest that you’re taking less risk,” William Tanona, a former Goldman analyst and current head of U.S. financials research at Collins Stewart, told The Journal.

Some things never change.

Dylan Ratigan on “The Great Con Job”

08 Thursday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alan Grayson, Dylan Ratigan, MSNBC, The Great Con Job, Zero Hedge

Dylan Ratigan and Alan Grayson yesterday on MSNBC detail The Great Con Job, and the perpetrators of the con; the unholy alliance of the banksters, the Federal Reserve, and our alleged representatives in Washington, D.C. From Zero Hedge:

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Dylan Ratigan, The Great Con Job“, posted with vodpod

Alan Greenspan and the “Everybody Missed It” Myth

05 Monday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, too big to fail, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alan Greenspan, ARM, Bernanke, Bruce Bartlett, Geithner, home prices, housing bubble, Lehman Brothers, Long Term Capital Management, missed it, Paul Krugman, This Week

On ABC’s This Week yesterday former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan once again pulled out the “nobody saw it coming” excuse for missing the conditions which led to the financial meltdown in 2008:

“…the reason it was missed is we have had no experience of the type of risks that arose following the default of Lehman Brothers in September 2008.That’s the critical mistake. And I made it. Everybody that I know who works in this business made it.”

False on many fronts. First, the “no experience” myth. The collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 was predictable, or should have been, by the failure of Long Term Capital Management in 1998 because both were brought about by similar business practices. Both had debt that far exceeded their assets and both were major players in the mortgage backed securities “shadow market.”

The other thing that “everyone” missed, according to Greenspan and his fellow revisionists anyway, and what was driving the mortgage backed securities explosion, was the housing bubble. Again false. Economists from Paul Krugman on the left to Reagan administration Treasury Department official Bruce Bartlett on the right were warning of the impending disaster in the housing market.

But putting aside economists for a minute, it shouldn’t have taken a Nobel Prize in economics to see that a 50% increase in home prices from 1995-2005 was unsustainable. Or that giving a $500,000 loan to someone with no documented income was not a good idea. Or that adjustable rate mortgages, 100% financing, interest-only loans, and all the other exotic mortgage variations were an accident looking for a time to happen. What was Greenspan saying at the time?

“Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said Monday that Americans’ preference for long-term, fixed-rate mortgages means many are paying more than necessary for their homes and suggested consumers would benefit if lenders offered more alternatives…He said a Fed study suggested many homeowners could have saved tens of thousands of dollars in the last decade if they had ARMs.”

No, Mr. Greenspan, not “everybody” missed it. YOU missed it. You and the disciples of the group-think mentality in Washington who were afraid to buck you because of your position as the alleged “Maestro” and “Wizard” who was responsible for the supposedly booming economy which was in reality a house of cards. Unfortunately two of those disciples, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner, are still in decision-making positions.

Just as a side note, there could be some fireworks at the Financial Crisis Commission hearings this week. Greenspan is set to testify on Wednesday and Don Robert Rubin-leone is up on Thursday.

Financial Crisis Round-Up

04 Sunday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, too big to fail, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

13 Bankers, Baseline Scenario, Debt Disaster Ahead, How Washington Abetted the Bank Job, Jamie Dimon, Market Oracle, McClatchy, Moody's board, New York Times, Politico, Reuters, Robert Reich, Simon Johnson, Sniveling Scamster, The Fed in Hot Water, The Most Dangerous Man in America, Thomas Hoenig, Timothy Geithner, Wall Street cabal, Zero Hedge

The constraints of time, due in large part to my newly-arrived copy of 13 Bankers, doesn’t allow extensive commentary on any of these posts from around the financial blogosphere, but all are deserving of a closer look:

Speaking of 13 Bankers, co-author Simon Johnson has a piece at Baseline Scenario on how a combination of political savvy and public relations acumen make JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon “The Most Dangerous Man in America.”

Mike Whitney’s “Timothy Geithner is a Sniveling Scamster” at The Market Oracle describes how President Obama’s new mortgage modification program is “just another stealth bailout” for the banksters.

Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge comments on  Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig’s extensive interview with Shahien Narisirpour of the Huffington Post.

Robert Reich’s “The Fed in Hot Water” on the belated admission of its taking tens of millions of bad loans off Bear Stearn’s books in order to facilitate their takeover by JPMorgan Chase.

Susan P. Koniak, George M. Cohen, David A. Dana and Thomas Ross in a New York Times op-ed entitled “How Washington Abetted the Bank Job” on the D.C buck-passing in regards to the regulators who were either incompetent or complicit (I choose the latter) in the Lehman Brothers Enron-like bookkeeping scam.

Speaking of inept, incompetent, or complicit so-called regulators, a McClatchy article asks, “Where was Moody’s board when top-rated bonds blew up?”

Herbert Lash at Reuters on the “Wall Street cabal” blocking derivative reform.

Finally, Rick Berman at Politico on the “Debt Disaster Dead Ahead.”

Quote of the Day: Simon Johnson

03 Saturday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, too big to fail, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

13 Bankers, Baseline Scenario, Huffington Post, Simon Johnson, Today Show, too big to fail

Simon Johnson, MIT professor, Huffington Post contributor, co-founder of Baseline Scenario, and author of the new book 13 Bankers, on why it is imperative that “Too Big To Fail” becomes a thing of the past:

“You can’t have a  market economy if some people have get out of jail free cards.”Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Simon Johnson on the Today Show“, posted with vodpod

The Case of JPMorgan and Jefferson County, Alabama

02 Friday Apr 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Goldman Sachs, Politics, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alabama, Jamie Dimon, Jefferson County, JPMorgan Chase, Looting Main Street, Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone

In a March 26 letter to shareholders Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, wrote:

“The crisis of the past couple of years has had far-reaching consequences, among them the declining public image of banks and bankers…[W]hen we vilify whole industries…we are denigrating ourselves and much of what made this country successful…We also should refrain from indiscriminate blame of any whole group of people…While JPMorgan Chase certainly made its share of mistakes in this tumultuous time, our firm always has remained focused on the fundamentals of banking and the part we can play to support our clients and communities.”

One example of JPMorgan’s “support” for their “clients and communities” and a reason for the “declining public image of banks and bankers” can be found in another in a long line of excellent pieces by Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone, entitled “Looting Main Street: How the nation’s biggest banks are ripping off American cities with the same predatory deals that brought down Greece”

The article is lengthy, but a must-read, in my opinion. It’s the story of bribery, corruption, and fraud in Jefferson County, Alabama. Briefly (or maybe not so briefly), it goes like this.

In the early 90’s the EPA sued the county in order to bring its antiquated sewer system into compliance with the Clean Water Act. In 1996 county commissioners decided to build the “Taj Mahal of sewage treatment plants” with cost estimates of $250 million. Taibbi:

“But in a wondrous demonstration of the possibilities of small-town graft and contract-padding, the price tag quickly swelled to more than $3 billion. County commissioners were literally pocketing wads of cash from builders and engineers and other contractors eager to get in on the project, while the county was forced to borrow obscene sums to pay for the rapidly spiraling costs.”

Originally the plan was to pay for the project by increasing sewer rates. But as costs continued to escalate county commissioners knew that sooner or later customers would revolt over the ever-increasing rates, so they started looking for “creative financing.” That’s music to the banksters ears and, true to form, they came riding to the rescue with their gobbledegook of variable rate refinancing and “swaps.”

Here’s where local JPMorgan rep Charles LeCroy meets crooked politician, with local “wheeler-dealer” Bill Blount as the middle man:

“LeCroy paid Blount millions of dollars, and Blount turned around and used the money to buy lavish gifts for his close friend Larry Langford, who at the time had just been elected president of the county commission…Langford then signed off on one after another of the deadly swap deals being pushed by LeCroy. Every time the county refinanced its sewer debt, JP Morgan made millions of dollars in fees.

Even more lucrative, each of the swap contracts contained clauses that mandated all sorts of penalties and payments in the event that something went wrong with the deal. In the mortgage business, this process is known as churning: You keep coming back over and over to refinance, and they keep “churning” you for more and more fees.”

But unbeknownst to LeCroy, Blount had a another suitor, Goldman Sachs. So:

“JP Morgan cut a separate deal with Goldman, paying the bank $3 million to [go away], with Blount taking a $300,000 cut of the side deal.”

The payoff for JPMorgan?:

“The deals wound up being the largest swap agreements in JP Morgan’s history. Making matters worse, the payoffs didn’t even wind up costing the bank a dime. As the SEC explained in a statement on the scam, JP Morgan “passed on the cost of the unlawful payments by charging the county higher interest rates on the swap transactions.”

In other words, not only did the bank bribe local politicians to take the [lousy] deal, they got local taxpayers to pay for the bribes. And because Jefferson County had no idea what kind of deal it was getting on the swaps, JP Morgan could basically charge whatever it wanted. According to an analysis of the swap deals commissioned by the county in 2007, taxpayers had been overcharged at least $93 million on the transactions.”

As happens  sooner or later with all Wall Street scams, the whole thing collapsed in early 2008. And as also happens with Wall Street scams, the banksters got the gold mine and the taxpayers of Jefferson County got the shaft.

But don’t think this is an isolated incident. Taibbi concludes:

“The destruction of Jefferson County reveals the basic battle plan of these modern barbarians, the way that banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs have systematically set out to pillage towns and cities from Pittsburgh to Athens. These guys aren’t number-crunching whizzes making smart investments; what they do is find suckers in some municipal-finance department, corner them in complex lose-lose deals and flay them alive. In a complete subversion of free-market principles, they take no risk, score deals based on political influence rather than competition, keep consumers in the dark — and walk away with big money.”

Any questions about that “declining public image” of banks and bankers, Mr. Dimon?

Elizabeth Warren on CNBC

31 Wednesday Mar 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Citigroup, CNBC, commercial real estate, Elizabeth Warren, Fannie, Freddie, TARP

In an interview with Maria Bartiromo yesterday on CNBC, TARP Oversight Panel chairperson Elizabeth Warren commented on a wide range of topics from the alleged “profit” the government will receive from the sale of shares of Citigroup, to “pulling the plug” on Fannie and Freddie, to the impending crash of the commercial real estate market.

About the sale of Citi stock, Dave Dryden at Firedoglake has the explanation of why it’s all accounting hocus pocus. The upshot is this–the TARP money Citi received was only a small portion of the total federal commitment.

This message to the TBTF’s made me want to stand up and cheer:

“I don’t care how big you are, if you make serious enough mistakes, then your business can be wiped out. There is no guarantee anymore.”

Are they listening at the White House, the Treasury, and the Fed? One can only hope.

But the most ominous warning was on commercial real estate, calling it a “very serious problem that we’re going to have to resolve over the next 3 years,” Warren added that nearly 3,000 mid-size banks have what she called a “dangerous concentration” in commercial real estate lending. Asked if she saw a “return to normalcy” in 2010, Warren said, “I don’t think so, I don’t see it.” Watch:Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Elizabeth Warren on CNBC“, posted with vodpod

Too Big To Fail is Too Big–Break ‘Em Up

30 Tuesday Mar 2010

Posted by Craig in bailout, economy, Financial Crisis, financial reform, financial regulation, Politics, Wall Street

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Citigroup, Dallas, derivatives, Dodd, Federal Reserve, Geithner, Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Volcker, Richard Fisher, Sheila Bair, Ted Kaufman, too big to fail

The chorus of those calling for breaking up the big banks is growing larger and louder by the day. Senator Ted Kaufman (D-DE) in a speech on the floor of the Senate last Friday:

“These mega-banks are too big to manage, too big to regulate, too big to fail and too interconnected to resolve when the next crisis hits.  We must break up these banks and separate again those commercial banking activities that are guaranteed by the government from those investment banking activities that are speculative and reflect greater risk.”

Richard Fisher, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, March 3:

“A truly effective restructuring of our regulatory regime will have to neutralize what I consider to be the greatest threat to our financial system’s stability—the so-called too-big-to-fail, or TBTF, banks. In the past two decades, the biggest banks have grown significantly bigger. In 1990, the 10 largest U.S. banks had almost 25 percent of the industry’s assets. Their share grew to 44 percent in 2000 and almost 60 percent in 2009.

…Given the danger these institutions pose to spreading debilitating viruses throughout the financial world, my preference is for a more prophylactic approach: an international accord to break up these institutions into ones of more manageable size—more manageable for both the executives of these institutions and their regulatory supervisors.”

Senator Kaufman and Mr. Fisher are just the latest additions to the list that includes former Fed chairman Paul Volcker, Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, FDIC head Sheila Bair, Sen. Cantwell, and Sen. McCain, among many others. Unfortunately, two names not on the list are Treasury Secretary Geithner and Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Chris Dodd.

And as if on cue, Citigroup gives us a prime example of why these financial behemoths need to be dissolved, and have what was once the “boring” business of commercial banking–taking deposits and making loans–separated from the risky business in which the banksters love to engage (with OPM of course) and why Wall Street cannot be left to its own devices:

“It appears that the pain of the recession is not deep enough to teach Citigroup Inc. what it needs to learn. The bank..is now readying a new unregulated insurance credit derivative, the CLX…The company is heading back into familiar territory where they’re putting taxpayer money into play on another risky bet. Simply put the instrument will enable it to gamble on future events by issuing complex financial instruments which attempt to quantify risk. This is very similar to the original business that Citigroup was heavily involved with that precipitated their fall from glory.”

Leopards and banksters never change their spots.

Where Are the Deficit Hawks on Pentagon Spending?

25 Thursday Mar 2010

Posted by Craig in Afghanistan, budget, economy, Iraq, Pentagon, Politics, war on terror

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

cost overruns, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, government spending, Pentagon

Think of what the reaction of the self-anointed deficit hawks in Washington would be to this headline in relation to any government spending not affiliated with the Pentagon:

“Cost of (insert name of program here) Will Be Double the Original Estimates”

Members of Congress would be stampeding to find a microphone and rail against wasteful government spending. The Tea Party movement would take to the streets in protest. Radio and TV talkers would be ranting about “stealing money from our children and grandchildren.” So why no outcry over this:

“Since 2001, when an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was expected to cost an already hefty $50 million, the plane’s cost has soared into the stratosphere…The estimated cost today is $113 million per plane.  Yes, that’s per plane….It’s also 2 ½ years behind schedule.  Keep in mind that the Marines, the Air Force, and the Navy are planning to buy a combined 2,450 of them for what’s now an eye-popping $323 billion.”

That’s assuming there are no more cost overruns. Quite a stretch, to say the least.

“In other words, if all goes well from here (an unlikely possibility), a single future weapons system is now estimated to cost the American taxpayer almost one-third of what the Obama administration’s health-care plan is expected to cost over a decade.”

Where are Sens. Nelson, Landrieu, and Lincoln? Where are Sen. McConnell, Rep. Boehner and the born-again fiscal conservatives in the Republican Party? Strangely silent. To his albeit limited credit, Sen. McCain offered this scathing rebuke (sarcasm intended) :

“The taxpayers are a little tired of this. I can’t say that I can blame them.”

Strong stuff there, huh?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Turn Out the Lights, the Revolution’s Over
  • Climbing Aboard the Hillary Train
  • You Say You Want a Revolution…
  • Proud to be a War Criminal
  • Drug Testing Welfare Applicants Struck Down in Florida

Archives

  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008

Blogroll

  • Bankster USA
  • Down With Tyranny
  • Firedoglake
  • Memeorandum
  • naked capitalism
  • Newshoggers
  • Obsidian Wings
  • Taylor Marsh
  • The Market Ticker
  • Tom Dispatch
  • Zero Hedge

Categories

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7 other subscribers
  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Desperado's Outpost
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Desperado's Outpost
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar