Tag Archives: Face the Nation

Rick Santorum on Prenatal Testing

20 Monday Feb 2012

Posted by in Politics

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , ,

Rick Santorum on Face the Nation yesterday, discussing prenatal testing, in particular amniocentesis:

Vodpod videos no longer available.                                                                                                                                                                                                                     “And in fact, prenatal testing, particularly amniocentesis — I’m not talking about general prenatal care…We’re talking about specifically prenatal testing, and specifically amniocentesis, which is a procedure that actually creates a risk of having a miscarriage when you have it, and is done for the purposes of identifying maladies in the womb. And which in many cases — in fact, most cases physicians recommend — particularly if there’s a problem — recommend abortion.”

Unlike Mr. Santorum, I don’t pretend to know what is said in private conversations between women and their doctors and whether or not in “most cases” abortion is “recommended.” My best guess, based on anecdotal evidence I have about this subject based on the experience of a family member, is that ‘presented as an option’ would be a more accurate term. Here’s why I say that.

My special needs niece, 21 years old at the time, went to a party one night where some low-life asshole slipped something in drink and raped her. When she woke up she had no memory of what happened and it wasn’t until a couple of months later she found out she was pregnant. Because no one knew who the father was, amniocentesis was done. The test results showed that the baby would have Down Syndrome, be severely retarded, and probably not live more than a few months. Abortion was presented as an option, it was not recommended.

But because of her religious beliefs, for my sister–45 years old at that point–abortion was out of the question for her daughter, and their choice was for the baby to be born. Their decision was that she and my brother-in-law would adopt the little girl and raise her as their daughter.

Fortunately, the doctors were wrong. The little girl who doctors said would have severe disabilities and only live a short time will celebrate her 17th birthday in April. She is autistic, but only mildly, and has been a joy and a blessing to the entire family.

That being said, I can also see the other side. A 45-year-old mother with a special needs daughter who is pregnant because she was raped, and who isn’t prepared–financially or emotionally–to take on the responsibility of raising another child  24 years after her last one was born. Especially a child with Down Syndrome who doctors say won’t live long and has little or no chance of ever becoming anything approaching a normal child.

You could not be more wrong, Mr. Santorum. Prenatal testing in general and amniocentesis in particular isn’t about anyone wanting to see disabled babies aborted or some plot to “cull the ranks of the disabled in our society.” It’s about choice, and that thing called freedom that Republicans claim to be so passionate about preserving. And that is the purpose of the testing, obtaining all the necessary information so an informed choice can be made.

Beware Wannabe Speakers Bearing Gifts

13 Monday Sep 2010

Posted by in budget, Congress, Conservatives, Democrats, economy, Obama, Obama administration, Politics, Republicans

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Speaker-in-waiting (he hopes) John Boehner says a few reasonable sounding words on Face the Nation and the headlines are about a ‘shift in policy,’ a ‘crack in Republican solidarity,’ a ‘victory for the Obama administration,’ and ‘Republicans caving on the tax cut battle.’ Three words of advice:

Don’t buy it.

First, why would anyone believe a word Boehner says? Then look at the entirety of his comments. Yes, he said,  “If the only option I have is to vote for some of those tax reductions, I’ll vote for it.” He also added, “But I’m going to do everything I can to fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans.” One hand giveth, the other taketh away.

Here’s what the Orangeman is doing as I see it. One, he’s taking a campaign issue away from the Democrats. He’s not going to let them beat the GOP over the head with ‘defenders of the rich’ for the next seven weeks, so he appears to show willingness to compromise.

Two, Boehner uses the qualifier “if the only option I have is…” because he knows that’s not the only option he’s going to have. He knows that, like everything else, the battle over extending the tax cuts is going to be in the Senate, not in the House. He knows that there are already 4 Democratic Senators—Bayh, Conrad, Nelson, and Webb—plus Joe Lieberman, who have come out in support of extending all the tax cuts for at least some period of time.

That’s why he also said this during the interview: “I don’t control the agenda on Capitol Hill. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid do…”

Here he’s painting the Democrats into somewhat of a corner. He and the Republicans can say, ‘See, it’s not us, it’s them. We’re not the obstructionists here. We’re willing to compromise but the president can’t get members of his own party to go along with him.’

Boehner hasn’t turned reasonable, it’s all a political calculation. Caveat emptor—let the buyer beware.